The Most Important C
Cut is considered by many to be the most important "C". Only when precisely calculated planes and angles are used,
does the stone achieve its greatest possible beauty. A badly cut diamond, no matter how good its color and clarity
will not match the fire and brilliance of a better-cut diamond with comparatively lower color and clarity.
View diamond parts in more detail.
Experts express differing opinions on the best table size (the diameter of the largest facet on the top of the stone)
and the best depth for a diamond, because these factors alone are not sufficient to accurately judge its cut.
Other factors - crown angle, girdle thickness, pavilion depth-percentage (the ratio of depth to girdle diameter),
culet size, polish and symmetry - also play a role in judging a diamond's overall cut quality.
Light Emission
A well-cut diamond will reflect most of the light back to the observer's eye. A poorly cut diamond will reflect only a
small proportion of the light that enters it.
Diamond Cut guides
We at Gemnation use the following data tables as a guideline to understanding cut grades for brilliant diamonds. Round
diamonds are the only shape that can be realistically evaluated with these measures. Other shapes, however, are also
dependent on other factors and mere mathematical formulae will not necessarily determine a diamond's magnficence.
The data presented here is a composite of information from a multitude of sources, including definitions of the Tolkowsky
Brilliant, Scandinavian Standard Brilliant, Eulitz Brilliant, and the AGS Laboratories' Ideal cut, together with our own
gemologists' knowledge and experience.
Round
Premium Ideal
Ideal
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total Depth %
59.5 - 61.9
59.1 - 62.3
58.5 - 63
57.5 - 63.5
57 - 64
56 - 67
<56 >67
Table %
55 - 57
53 - 58
52 - 60
51.5 - 63
51 - 65
50 - 70
<50 >70
Symmetry
VG - EX
G - EX
G - EX
G - EX
All
All
All
Culet
None
None - Med
None - Sl. Large
None - Large
None - Large
None - Very Large
None - Extr. Large
Gridle
Thin, Med, Sl Thk
Thin, Med, Sl Thk, Thk
Thin, Med, Sl Thk, Thk
Very Thn - Thick
Very Thn - Very Thick
Ext Thn - Ext Thick
Ext Thn - Ext Thick
Polish
VG - EX
G - EX
G - EX
All
All
All
All
Clarity
SI1 - FL
SI1 - FL
All
All
All
All
All
Princess
Premium Ideal
Ideal
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total Depth %
65 - 70
63 - 70
62 - 73
62 - 75
56 - 82
55 - 86
<55 >86
Table %
65 - 72
65 - 72
62 - 74
57 - 78
55 - 85
57 - 89
<57 >89
Ratio L:W
1:1 - 1.05:1
1:1 - 1.15:1
1:1 - 1.75:1
1:1 - 1.75:1
1:1 - 2:1
1:1 - 2:1
1:1 - 2:1
Radiant
Premium Ideal
Ideal
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total Depth %
63 - 70
63 - 70
63 - 72
62 - 74
56 - 78
55 - 83
<55 >83
Table %
68 - 72
68 - 72
67 - 74
65 - 78
63 - 80
53 - 83
<53 >83
Ratio L:W
1:1 - 1.05:1
1:1 - 1.15:1
1:1 - 1.75:1
1:1 - 1.75:1
1:1 - 2:1
1:1 - 2:1
1:1 - 2:1
Emerald
Premium Ideal
Ideal
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total Depth %
61 - 67.5
61 - 67.5
61 - 69
60 - 70
58 - 75.5
54.5 - 81
<54.5 >81
Table %
62 - 69
62 - 69
62 - 71
61 - 72
56 - 75
55 - 82
<55 >82
Ratio L:W
1.3:1 - 1.4:1
1.2:1 - 1.75:1
1.05:1 - 2:1
1.05:1 - 2:1
1.05:1 - 2:1
1.05:1 - 2:1
1.05:1 - 2:1
Oval
Premium Ideal
Ideal
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total Depth %
59 - 62
59 - 62
69 - 63
57.5 - 65.5
55 - 69
46 - 76
<46 >76
Table %
57 - 60
57 - 60
54 - 61.5
52 - 64
51 - 66
50 - 71
<50 >71
Ratio L:W
1.4:1 - 1.6:1
1.35:1 - 1.65:1
1.3:1 - 1.7:1
1.1:1 - 1.90:1
1.1:1 - 1.90:1
1.1:1 - 1.90:1
1.1:1 - 1.90:1
Pear
Premium Ideal
Ideal
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total Depth %
59 - 63
59 - 63
59 - 64
58 - 65
54 - 69
51 - 73
<51 >73
Table %
57 - 60
57 - 60
54 - 62.5
53 - 64
51 - 66
48 - 70
<48 >70
Ratio L:W
1.6:1 - 1.7:1
1.5:1 - 1.75:1
1.25:1 - 1.85:1
1.2:1 - 1.9:1
1.1:1 - 2.0:1
1.1:1 - 2.0:1
1.1:1 - 2.0:1
Marquise
Premium Ideal
Ideal
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total Depth %
59 - 63
59 - 63
58 - 64
57.5 - 65
54.5 - 69
50.5 - 75
<50.5 >75
Table %
57 - 60
57 - 60
55 - 62
53 - 64
51 - 66
50 - 70
<50 >70
Ratio L:W
1.9:1 - 2.1:1
1.75:1 - 2.25:1
1.70:1 - 2.3:1
1.60:1 - 2.4:1
1.50:1 - 2.5:1
1.50:1 - 2.5:1
1.50:1 - 2.5:1
Heart
Premium Ideal
Ideal
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total Depth %
57 - 59
57 - 59
56 - 60
54 - 60
51 - 62
46 - 67
<46 >67
Table %
57 - 60
57 - 60
54 - 62
53 - 64
51 - 66
46 - 70
<46 >70
Ratio L:W
0.98:1 - 1.02:1
0.90:1 - 1.10:1
0.85:1 - 1.15:1
0.82:1 - 1.18:1
0.80:1 - 1.20:1
0.80:1 - 1.20:1
0.80:1 - 1.20:1
Cushion
Premium Ideal
Ideal
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total Depth %
59 - 62
59 - 62
58 - 64
57 - 69
55 - 73
50 - 80
<50 >80
Table %
57 - 60
57 - 60
54 - 62
52 - 65
51 - 67
48 - 72
<48 >72
Ratio L:W
1:1 - 1.05:1
1:1 - 1.10:1
1:1 - 1.12:1
1:1 - 1.15:1
1:1 - 1.20:1
1:1 - 1.20:1
1:1 - 1.20:1
Trilliant
Premium Ideal
Ideal
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total Depth %
40 - 42
40 - 42
38 - 44
37 - 45
35 - 48
30 - 54
<30 >54
Table %
58 - 60
57 - 60
54 - 62
52 - 65
51 - 67
48 - 72
<48 >72
Ratio L:W
0.98:1 - 1.02:1
0.95:1 - 1.05:1
0.92:1 - 1.08:1
0.90:1 - 1.10:1
0.88:1 - 1.12:1
0.88:1 - 1.12:1
0.88:1 - 1.12:1
Asscher
Premium Ideal
Ideal
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total Depth %
59 - 67
59 - 67
59 - 69
57 - 72
55 - 75
50 - 78
<50 >78
Table %
57 - 60
57 - 60
53 - 62
52 - 72
55 - 75
50 - 78
<50 >78
Ratio L:W
1:1 - 1.02:1
1:1 - 1.05:1
1:1 - 1.05:1
1:1 - 1.08:1
1:1 - 1.08:1
1:1 - 1.08:1
1:1 - 1.08:1